Providing water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) to emergency-affected populations is necessary for dignity and disease control. Humanitarian response is coordinated via the 'cluster approach'. We summarized the outcomes and impacts… Click to show full abstract
Providing water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) to emergency-affected populations is necessary for dignity and disease control. Humanitarian response is coordinated via the 'cluster approach'. We summarized the outcomes and impacts of WASH cluster coordination using; literature review; UNICEF document review; and, key informant interviews. Across these three data sets, consistent themes were identified, including: the cluster approach evolved into a cost-effective 'best-fit' model; cluster staff require technical and coordination skills; context is related to cluster performance; and, there are trade-offs of cluster participation for members. Additionally, consistent intractable challenges were identified, including: accountability to beneficiaries; cross-cluster and sub-national cluster coordination; working with national governments; and, transition to post-emergency. We found previous research was largely subjective and did not address future cluster challenges. Evaluation of cluster outcomes and impacts, including member and beneficiary perspectives is needed. To enable this research, a theory of change for cluster coordination was also developed. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.