Traditional biomarkers of renal disease have a number of limitations, whether evaluating veterinary patients or performing preclinical toxicity studies. Serum creatinine and urea nitrogen are affected by nonrenal influences that… Click to show full abstract
Traditional biomarkers of renal disease have a number of limitations, whether evaluating veterinary patients or performing preclinical toxicity studies. Serum creatinine and urea nitrogen are affected by nonrenal influences that limit their usefulness for detecting small but significant decreases in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in veterinary patients. These nonrenal influences can be more controlled in preclinical studies than in clinical patients; however, because of its high functional reserve, these estimates of GFR are insensitive for detecting kidney injury prior to loss of a substantial proportion of functioning nephrons. Urine biomarkers can be highly sensitive for tubular or glomerular injury that might lead to irreversible damage to the nephron. Several proteins are qualified by the Food and Drug Administration for nonclinical application as urinary biomarkers of drug-induced nephrotoxicity, and many of these also have preliminary data supporting their usefulness for kidney injury in dogs and cats. In addition to these relatively recently identified biomarkers, efforts are underway to discover new renal biomarkers using a variety of techniques including liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry and small RNA sequencing. Ultimately, the interplay between preclinical studies and clinical patients in discovery and validation of renal biomarkers is critical to their successful implementation.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.