BACKGROUND Predicting prognosis in heart failure (HF) is of major importance. AIM The aim of the study was to define predictors influencing long-term cardiovascular mortality or HF hospitalization ("composite outcome")… Click to show full abstract
BACKGROUND Predicting prognosis in heart failure (HF) is of major importance. AIM The aim of the study was to define predictors influencing long-term cardiovascular mortality or HF hospitalization ("composite outcome") based on clinical status and measurements obtained after the 9-week hybrid comprehensive telerehabilitation (HCTR) program. METHODS This analysis is based on TELEREH-HF (TELEREHabilitation in Heart Failure) multicenter, randomized trial that enrolled 850 HF patients (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF]≤40%). Patients were randomized 1:1 to 9-week HCTR plus usual care (development sample) or usual care only (validation sample) and followed for median 24 months (Q1:20 Q3:24) for development of the composite outcome. RESULTS Over 12-24 months of follow-up 108 (28.1%) patients experienced the composite endpoint. The predictors of our composite outcome were: non-ischaemic etiology of HF, diabetes, higher serum level of: N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide, creatinine, and high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein; low carbon dioxide output atpeak exercise, high minute ventilation and breathing frequency at maximum effort in cardiopulmonary exercise test; increase of delta of average heart rate in 24h-ECG Holter monitoring, lower LVEF and patients' non-adherence to HCTR. The model discrimination C-index=0.795 and decreased to 0.755 on validation conducted in the control sample which was not used in derivation. The 2-year risk of the composite outcome was 48% in the top tertile versus 5% in the bottom tertile of the developed risk score. CONCLUSION Risk factors collected at the end of the 9-week telerehabilitation period performed well in stratifying patients based on their 2-year risk of the composite outcome. Patients in the top tertile had an almost ten-fold higher risk compared to patients in the bottom tertile. Adherence to treatment but not peakVO₂ or quality of life were significantly associated with the outcome.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.