LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

How Should Exposure Risk to Tactical Personnel Be Balanced Against Clinical and Ethical Rescue Demand?

Photo from wikipedia

Chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive devices can all be used to cause mass disruption and mass casualties. These incidents can occur naturally but are usually associated with terrorism and… Click to show full abstract

Chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive devices can all be used to cause mass disruption and mass casualties. These incidents can occur naturally but are usually associated with terrorism and often require prehospital and hospital care for patients and various precautions for clinicians. It is important to consider for each kind of exposure how clinical and ethical demand for rescue should be balanced against field-based risk of injury, contamination, or death to tactical personnel. Chemical exposures typically require prompt extrication, decontamination, and medical management; biological and radiation exposures generally require donning personal protective equipment; and explosives could contain "dirty bombs" or secondary devices.

Keywords: rescue; clinical ethical; exposure risk; demand; tactical personnel

Journal Title: AMA journal of ethics
Year Published: 2022

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.