Key Points Question Compared with standard cessation approaches, can long-term nicotine replacement therapy lead to higher rates of cessation or reductions in carcinogen exposure among smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary… Click to show full abstract
Key Points Question Compared with standard cessation approaches, can long-term nicotine replacement therapy lead to higher rates of cessation or reductions in carcinogen exposure among smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? Findings In this randomized clinical trial of 398 smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 23 of 197 (11.7%) receiving a standard smoking cessation intervention had quit at 12 months, compared with 24 of 197 (12.2%) receiving long-term nicotine replacement therapy. Both groups had comparable reductions in carcinogen and smoke exposure. Meaning Long-term nicotine replacement therapy provides an option for smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease but does not result in greater rates of cessation or harm reduction.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.