LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Development of a Group Judgment Process for Forecasts of Health Care Innovations

Photo by impulsq from unsplash

Key Points Question What is the accuracy of future predictions of technologic breakthrough innovations in the next 20 years? Findings In 2001, a diverse group of research and clinical experts… Click to show full abstract

Key Points Question What is the accuracy of future predictions of technologic breakthrough innovations in the next 20 years? Findings In 2001, a diverse group of research and clinical experts was assembled to predict the likelihood of various breakthrough innovations in the next 20 years in Alzheimer disease and cardiovascular disease. In 2017, another group of clinical experts in each condition was assembled to judge the accuracy of these predictions and found that 15 of 17 predictions were judged to have been close to correct or directionally correct, 2 predictions were judged to be incorrect, and 3 breakthrough innovations occurred that were not predicted. Meaning This method produced predictions that were good but not completely accurate; further work is needed to improve methods of innovation forecasting.

Keywords: development group; judgment process; group; group judgment; process forecasts; breakthrough innovations

Journal Title: JAMA Network Open
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.