LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Effect of Clinician Training in the Modular Approach to Therapy for Children vs Usual Care on Clinical Outcomes and Use of Empirically Supported Treatments

Photo by nappystudio from unsplash

Key Points Question Is training in the Modular Approach to Therapy for Children (MATCH) associated with more use of empirically supported treatments, better clinical outcomes, and better service efficiency than… Click to show full abstract

Key Points Question Is training in the Modular Approach to Therapy for Children (MATCH) associated with more use of empirically supported treatments, better clinical outcomes, and better service efficiency than usual care? Findings This randomized clinical trial found that training clinicians in MATCH was associated with high levels of adherence to empirically supported treatments (80.0%) compared with usual care (57.0%), but it was not associated with improved clinical outcomes or efficiency. Meaning These findings suggest that training in MATCH increases clinicians’ use of empirically supported treatments but does not necessarily improve clinical outcomes.

Keywords: empirically supported; clinical outcomes; use empirically; training; usual care; supported treatments

Journal Title: JAMA Network Open
Year Published: 2020

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.