LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Evaluation of a National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines–Based Decision Support Tool in Patients With Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Photo from wikipedia

Key Points Question Is exposure to the National Comprehensive Cancer Center guidelines associated with decreased decisional conflict and increased rates of guideline-concordant care in patients with non–small cell lung cancer?… Click to show full abstract

Key Points Question Is exposure to the National Comprehensive Cancer Center guidelines associated with decreased decisional conflict and increased rates of guideline-concordant care in patients with non–small cell lung cancer? Findings In this nonrandomized clinical trial, exposure to the National Comprehensive Cancer Center guidelines in 76 patients with non–small cell lung cancer was associated with increased smoking cessation counseling and decreased use of adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of early-stage disease. Use of the tool during consultation was also associated with decreased decisional conflict and greater satisfaction with their decision by the patients. Meaning The findings of this study suggest that use of cancer treatment guidelines is not in conflict with shared decision-making; increasing patients’ access to guidelines appears to improve the quality of oncologic care.

Keywords: comprehensive cancer; patients non; national comprehensive; non small; cancer; small cell

Journal Title: JAMA Network Open
Year Published: 2020

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.