LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Comparison of 3 Randomized Clinical Trials of Frontline Therapies for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Photo from wikipedia

Key Points Question Are frontline therapies recommended for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) associated with patient benefits? Findings In this comparative effectiveness study of 1501 participants, the statistical robustness of the… Click to show full abstract

Key Points Question Are frontline therapies recommended for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) associated with patient benefits? Findings In this comparative effectiveness study of 1501 participants, the statistical robustness of the Mesothelioma Cisplatin Pemetrexed Study (MPS), Mesothelioma Avastin Cisplatin Pemetrexed Study (MAPS), and CheckMate743 (CM743) study were assessed by analysis of the survival curves, survival-inferred fragility index, and censoring patterns. The overall survival curves of the CM743 trial and MAPS overlapped, despite worse performance status in MAPS; unequal censoring was observed in the CM743 trial, particularly in the nonepithelioid subtype, and the survival-inferred fragility index was low in all trials. Meaning These findings suggest that no conclusion regarding survival benefit can be drawn from the 3 included trials; future clinical trials involving novel cancer treatments should consider more factors before registration.

Keywords: malignant pleural; clinical trials; frontline therapies; pleural mesothelioma; mesothelioma; study

Journal Title: JAMA Network Open
Year Published: 2022

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.