LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Reporting of Statistical Inference in Abstracts of Major Cancer Journals, 1990 to 2020

Photo by nci from unsplash

Key Points Question How has the reporting of statistical inference in abstracts of major cancer journals evolved over time? Findings In this serial cross-sectional study, reporting of confidence intervals increased… Click to show full abstract

Key Points Question How has the reporting of statistical inference in abstracts of major cancer journals evolved over time? Findings In this serial cross-sectional study, reporting of confidence intervals increased over time in most journals, with most abstracts including confidence intervals from 2016 to 2020; however, the proportion of abstracts reporting statistical inference based solely on the terms significant or nonsignificant was 24% during this period. Reporting of results from randomized clinical trials and the requirement to report according to guidelines were associated with a higher prevalence of confidence interval reporting. Meaning These findings suggest that the reporting of statistical inference in abstracts of major cancer journals has improved over time and may continue to improve with the implementation of reporting guidelines.

Keywords: major cancer; abstracts major; inference abstracts; reporting statistical; statistical inference

Journal Title: JAMA Network Open
Year Published: 2022

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.