LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Assessment of Adherence to Reporting Guidelines by Commonly Used Clinical Prediction Models From a Single Vendor

Photo by lomogee from unsplash

Key Points Question What items are collectively requested by model reporting guidelines and does documentation for deployed clinical predictive models report this information? Findings This systematic review combined 15 model… Click to show full abstract

Key Points Question What items are collectively requested by model reporting guidelines and does documentation for deployed clinical predictive models report this information? Findings This systematic review combined 15 model reporting guidelines and identified 220 distinct requested items. A review of the documentation of 12 deployed models from a single vendor found that the median item completion rate was 39%, and although commonly requested items were highly reported, at least half of the documentation could have provided more information on reliability (including external validation) and fairness. Meaning These findings suggest that items collectively requested by guidelines represent a substantial reporting burden, and additions regarding reliability and fairness may improve their documentation.

Keywords: models single; single vendor; reporting guidelines; documentation

Journal Title: JAMA Network Open
Year Published: 2022

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.