LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Analysis of Obstetric Outcomes by Hospital Location, Volume, and Teaching Status Associated With Non–Medically Indicated Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks

Photo by lensshooter from unsplash

Key Points Question Do obstetric outcomes of nulliparous women with low-risk pregnancies managed with non–medically indicated induction of labor at 39 weeks’ gestation compared with expectant management differ among hospitals… Click to show full abstract

Key Points Question Do obstetric outcomes of nulliparous women with low-risk pregnancies managed with non–medically indicated induction of labor at 39 weeks’ gestation compared with expectant management differ among hospitals by location, obstetric volume, and teaching status? Findings In this cohort study including 455 044 births, the adjusted odds of cesarean birth among individuals undergoing induction of labor were significantly lower in all settings except for low-volume hospitals, in which there was no significant difference. In addition, there were lower rates of maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes in all settings with induction of labor. Meaning The findings of this study suggest that non–medically indicated induction of labor may be associated with a lower rate of cesarean birth in a range of hospital settings.

Keywords: non medically; indicated induction; medically indicated; induction labor; induction

Journal Title: JAMA Network Open
Year Published: 2023

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.