LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Characteristics of Semiautomated Endothelial Cell-Density Measurements Among Corneal Donor Eyes.

Photo from wikipedia

Importance Endothelial cell density in corneal donor eyes remains a critical component in selecting tissue suitable for corneal transplant. Objective To describe an anomaly in endothelial cell density discovered in… Click to show full abstract

Importance Endothelial cell density in corneal donor eyes remains a critical component in selecting tissue suitable for corneal transplant. Objective To describe an anomaly in endothelial cell density discovered in a large cohort of corneal donor eyes. Design, Setting, and Participants Donor information for this cross-sectional study was obtained from the CorneaGen eye bank for donors from June 1, 2012, to June 30, 2016. Endothelial cell density was reported by eye bank technicians for each eye. The retrospective donor data set included donor demographics, endothelial cell count, time of death, medical and surgical history, and suitability for transplant. The donor data set contained information on donated eyes over the 4-year period. Main Outcomes and Measures Endothelial cell-density heat map, 2-dimensional binned plots, and bayesian change point analysis. Results A total of 48 207 donated eyes were evaluated. Mean (SD) cell count was 2717 (448) cells/mm2, and mean (SD) donor age was 58 (13) years. Heat maps using 2-dimensional binned plots demonstrated accentuated endothelial cell density results particularly at and immediately above 2500 cells/mm2 with a small gap right under this figure. A bayesian change point analysis revealed a change point at exactly this location as well. Conclusions and Relevance Data from this cross-sectional study suggest a discontinuity in endothelial cell-density measurements just below 2500 cells/mm2. This anomaly suggests that the semiautomated counting technique used in this cohort preferentially skipped over measurements just below this cutoff. Whether this represents an automation error, or more likely, a subjective human bias, requires further study.

Keywords: cell; corneal donor; donor eyes; cell density; endothelial cell

Journal Title: JAMA ophthalmology
Year Published: 2022

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.