LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

On different approaches to modeling

Photo by daviator737 from unsplash

1 _ _   cmplx Math cmplx Geol . (1) This statement summarizes two end-member cases of modeling that can be illustrated with examples from mechanics of faulting. On… Click to show full abstract

1 _ _   cmplx Math cmplx Geol . (1) This statement summarizes two end-member cases of modeling that can be illustrated with examples from mechanics of faulting. On one hand, highly complex multi physics/chemistry processes in heterogeneous crustal-scale structures are often analyzed with back-of-theenvelope approximations and simple terms such as dislocations on a planar surface in a homogeneous solid. On the other hand, far simpler engineered rock samples in laboratory experiments under controlled conditions are often analyzed with elaborate mathematical models of complex constitutive laws having many parameters and variables. As noted by the statistician George Box, "all models are wrong but some are useful". The question, keeping in mind Sibson's observation, is which models are useful in what circumstances. The answer depends on whether one is interested in engineering applications or scientific understanding.

Keywords: approaches modeling; different approaches

Journal Title: Journal of Geophysical Research
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.