LAUSR

Research data sharing is appealing for its potential benefits on sharers’ scientific impact and is also advocated by various policies. How do scientific benefits and policies correlate with practical ecological data sharing? In this study, we investigated data-sharing practices in eddy covariance flux research as a typical case. First, we collected researchers’ data-sharing information from major observation networks. Then, we downloaded bibliometric data from the Web of Science and evaluated scientific impact using LeaderRank, a synthetic algorithm that takes both citation and cooperation impacts into consideration. Our results demonstrated the following: (1) specific to eddy covariance flux research, 8% of researchers published information in public data portals, whereas 64% of researchers provided their available data online in a downloadable form; (2) regional differences in data sharing, publications, and observation networks existed; and (3) the data sharers in impact-ranked ecologists followed a long-tail distribution, which suggested that, although sharing data is not necessary for researchers to be influential, data sharers are more likely to be high-impact researchers. Differentiated policies should be proposed to encourage ecologists in the long tail of data sharers, and from regions with little tradition of data sharing, to embrace a more open model of science.