LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Volumetric‐based image guidance is superior to marker‐based alignments for stereotactic body radiotherapy of prostate cancer

Photo from wikipedia

Abstract Purposes The aim of this study was to evaluate a dual marker‐based and soft‐tissue based image guidance for inter‐fractional corrections in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of prostate cancer. Methods/Materials… Click to show full abstract

Abstract Purposes The aim of this study was to evaluate a dual marker‐based and soft‐tissue based image guidance for inter‐fractional corrections in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of prostate cancer. Methods/Materials We reviewed 18 patients treated with SBRT for prostate cancer. An endorectal balloon was inserted at simulation and each treatment. Planning margins were 3 mm/0 mm posteriorly. Prior to each treatment, a dual image guidance protocol was applied to align three makers using stereoscopic x ray images and then to the soft tissue using kilo‐voltage cone beam CT (kV‐CBCT). After treatment, prostate (CTV), rectal wall, and bladder were delineated on each kV‐CBCT, and delivered dose was recalculated. Dosimetric endpoints were analyzed, including V36.25 Gy for prostate, and D0.03 cc for bladder and rectal wall. Results Following initial marker alignment, additional translational shifts were applied to 22 of 84 fractions after kV‐CBCT. Among the 22 fractions, ten fractions exceeded 3 mm shifts in any direction, including one in the left‐right direction, four in the superior‐inferior direction, and five in the anterior‐posterior direction. With and without the additional kV‐CBCT shifts, the average V36.25 Gy of the prostate for the 22 fractions was 97.6 ± 2.6% with the kV x ray image alone, and was 98.1 ± 2.4% after applying the additional kV‐CBCT shifts. The improvement was borderline statistical significance using Wilcoxon signed‐rank test (P = 0.007). D0.03 cc was 45.8 ± 6.3 Gy vs. 45.1 ± 4.9 Gy for the rectal wall; and 49.5 ± 8.6 Gy vs. 49.3 ± 7.9 Gy for the bladder before and after applying kV‐CBCT shifts. Conclusions Marker‐based alignment alone is not sufficient. Additional adjustments are needed for some patients based kV‐CBCT.

Keywords: prostate; image; prostate cancer; image guidance; marker based

Journal Title: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.