LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Reproducibility of deep inspiration breath‐hold technique for left‐side breast cancer with respiratory monitoring device, Abches

Photo from wikipedia

Abstract Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of deep inspiration breath‐hold (DIBH) using a respiratory control device, Abches, in patients with left‐sided breast cancer. Material and methods Abches… Click to show full abstract

Abstract Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of deep inspiration breath‐hold (DIBH) using a respiratory control device, Abches, in patients with left‐sided breast cancer. Material and methods Abches comprises a main body, an indicator panel, and two fulcrums, one each on the chest and abdomen. Forty left side breast cancer patients treated with DIBH using abches were enrolled in this study. For all patients, CT images were taken three times to confirm the target position inside the body and to check the breath‐hold reproducibility. Three anatomical points on the nipple, sternum, and heart were selected as measurement points on CT images. After measuring the coordinates, breath‐hold reproducibility was defined as the mean of the absolute difference in the coordinates between the three CT images. The maximum differences were also investigated. In addition, the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was calculated to examine the displacement of the heart volume in detail. Moreover, digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) and linac graphs (LGs) were used to measure the positional accuracy of the chest and heart. Results The reproducibility in all patients was within 0.75 mm for the nipple, 0.78 mm for the sternum, and 2.18 mm for the heart in each direction. Similarly, the maximum displacements for all patients were within 1.90 mm, 1.69 mm, and 4.75 mm, respectively, in each direction. For heart volume, the average DSC for all cases was 0.93 ± 0.01. The differences between the DRR and LG images were 1.70 ± 1.10 mm and 2.10 ± 1.60 mm, for the chest and heart, respectively. Conclusion Our study showed that DIBH using Abches can be performed with good target reproducibility of less than 3 mm with proper breath‐hold practice, whereas the heartbeat‐derived reproducibility of the cardiac position is poor and needs to be monitored carefully during treatment simulation

Keywords: breast cancer; reproducibility; breath hold; heart

Journal Title: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Year Published: 2022

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.