LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Three discipline collaborative radiation therapy (3DCRT) special debate: A physicist's time is better spent in direct patient/provider interaction than in the patient's chart

Photo by tomspentys from unsplash

Radiation oncology is a highly multidisciplinary medical specialty, drawing significantly from three scientific disciplines—medicine, physics, and biology. As a result, discussion of controversies or changes in practice within radiation oncology… Click to show full abstract

Radiation oncology is a highly multidisciplinary medical specialty, drawing significantly from three scientific disciplines—medicine, physics, and biology. As a result, discussion of controversies or changes in practice within radiation oncology involves input from all three disciplines. For this reason, significant effort has been expended recently to foster collaborative multidisciplinary research in radiation oncology, with substantial demonstrated benefit.1,2 In light of these results, we have adopted this “team-science” approach to the traditional debates featured in this journal. This article is part of a series of special debates entitled “three discipline collaborative radiation therapy (3DCRT)”, in which each debate team has included three multidisciplinary team members, with the hope that this format would be

Keywords: oncology; three discipline; patient; radiation; discipline collaborative; collaborative radiation

Journal Title: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Year Published: 2022

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.