LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Rate‐Dependent Decohesion Modes in Graphene‐Sandwiched Interfaces

Photo from wikipedia

Practical industrial mass production of macrosized graphene has been realized with the development of the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method, envisioning a wide range of potential applications in microelectronic devices.[1–3]… Click to show full abstract

Practical industrial mass production of macrosized graphene has been realized with the development of the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method, envisioning a wide range of potential applications in microelectronic devices.[1–3] However, as a key step in the fabrication process, the successful transfer of highquality macrosized graphene to a specific target substrate of these devices continues to be a challenge. Compared with the typical transfer method of graphene, which often involves wet chemical etching, the etching-free mechanical dry-transfer process is fast, renewable, cost-competitive, and environmentally friendly.[4,5] The adhesion energy of graphene to various substrate materials, as a key parameter characterizing the mechanical resistance to delamination of the graphene/substrate interface, has been shown to be a critical factor determining the quality of the transferred graphene and the performance of graphene-based devices.[5] Therefore, the development of an appropriate method for measuring the adhesion energy of the graphene/substrate interface is essential for large-scale fabrication and device applications of graphene. In the last decade, significant progress has been made in experimental investigations characterizing the interfacial properties of graphene using the shear-lag method,[6–10] the blister tests,[11–16] the double cantilever beam (DCB) fracture tests,[5,17,18] and nanoindentation methods.[19,20] Shearlag methods are often employed to study sliding and shear interactions of the graphene/substrate interfaces, whereas the adhesion energy is typically measured using the DCB and blister tests. For experimental investigation of the adhesive interactions, Koenig et al.[11] performed a pressurized blister test by creating a pressure difference across the graphene membrane to directly measure the adhesion energy between graphene and a silicon-oxide substrate and obtained a value of Γg/Si = 0.45 ± 0.02 J m−2, whereas Wang et al.[12] used the same method to obtain a smaller value of Γg/Si = 0.19 ± 0.02 J m−2. Recently, Xin et al.[13] measured the adhesion energy of the as-grown graphene on copper foil of different roughness using a blister test and obtained values Mechanical dry transfer of large-area graphene is increasingly applied in fabrication of graphene-based electronic devices, and adhesion energy of graphene/substrate interface is a key factor affecting reliability and performance of these devices. Herein, the adhesion energy of a graphene/poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) interface is measured by widely adopted double cantilever beam (DCB) fracture tests. Results show that the apparent adhesion energy of sandwiched interface is highly rate-dependent. When separation rate increases from 20 to 150 μm s−1, apparent adhesion energy increases by an order of magnitude. By examining fractured interfaces after DCB tests with micro-Raman spectroscopy, the graphene is found to be fractured and transferred in fragments, with residual tensile strain up to 3% for high separation rates. The results are contrary to earlier reports, where higher separation rate in dry-transfer process would typically enhance the dry transfer of graphene, resulting in better integrity and performance. Based on Raman spectroscopy measurements, three distinct decohesion modes are identified for PET-/ graphene-/adhesive-sandwiched interface, which consistently explain the rate-dependent apparent adhesion energy. The complicated decohesion modes also suggest that an optimal separation rate should be used to properly measure the adhesion energy and improve the dry-transfer technique of graphene with minimum damage and residual strain.

Keywords: graphene; adhesion energy; rate; transfer

Journal Title: Advanced Materials Interfaces
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.