"Comparison  of  efficacy, safety, and costs between neoadjuvant hypofractionated radiotherapy and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma"

LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Comparison  of  efficacy, safety, and costs between neoadjuvant hypofractionated radiotherapy and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma

We compared the efficacy, safety, and costs of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) and conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) for the neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal cancer. Click to show full abstract

We compared the efficacy, safety, and costs of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) and conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) for the neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal cancer.

Keywords: efficacy safety; safety costs; fractionated radiotherapy; hypofractionated radiotherapy

Journal Title: Cancer Medicine
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)

Share on Social Media: Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
0

LAUSR

You are not signed in:

Sign Up!

Related content

More Information News Social Media Video Recommended