LAUSR

Mitochondrial membrane‐embedded redox proteins are classically perceived as deterministic “electron transport chain” (ETC) arrays cum proton pumps; and oxygen is seen as an “immobile terminal electron acceptor.” This is untenable because: (1) there are little free protons to be pumped out of the matrix; (2) proton pumping would be highly endergonic; (3) ETC‐chemiosmosis‐rotary ATP synthesis proposal is “irreducibly complex”/”non‐evolvable” and does not fit with mitochondrial architecture or structural/distribution data of the concerned proteins/components; (4) a plethora of experimental observations do not conform to the postulates/requisites; for example, there is little evidence for viable proton‐pumps/pH‐gradient in mitochondria, trans‐membrane potential (TMP) is non‐fluctuating/non‐trappable, oxygen is seen to give copious “diffusible reactive (oxygen) species” (DRS/DROS) in milieu, etc. Quite contrarily, the newly proposed murburn model's tenets agree with known principles of energetics/kinetics, and builds on established structural data and reported observations. In this purview, oxygen is needed to make DRS, the principal component of mitochondrial function. Complex V and porins respectively serve as proton‐inlet and turgor‐based water‐exodus portals, thereby achieving organellar homeostasis. Complexes I to IV possess ADP‐binding sites and their redox‐centers react/interact with O2/DRS. At/around these complexes, DRS cross‐react or activate/oxidize ADP/Pi via fast thermogenic one‐electron reaction(s), condensing to form two‐electron stabilized products (H2O2/H2O/ATP). The varied architecture and distribution of components in mitochondria validate DRS as (i) the coupling agent of oxidative reactions and phosphorylations, and (ii) the primary reason for manifestation of TMP in steady‐state. Explorations along the new precepts stand to provide greater insights on mitochondrial function and pathophysiology.