LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Bivalirudin versus heparin for peripheral vascular intervention: You get what you pay for…

Photo by kommumikation from unsplash

There are no randomized trials comparing bivalirudin with heparin in patients undergoing peripheral vascular intervention. Retrospective analyses suggest that bivalirudin treatment during peripheral vascular intervention is associated with less bleeding… Click to show full abstract

There are no randomized trials comparing bivalirudin with heparin in patients undergoing peripheral vascular intervention. Retrospective analyses suggest that bivalirudin treatment during peripheral vascular intervention is associated with less bleeding and a reduction in major adverse clinical events. Despite a higher acquisition cost compared with heparin, bivalirudin may actually provide more value and possibly reduce the total cost of care associated with peripheral interventions.

Keywords: heparin peripheral; vascular intervention; bivalirudin versus; versus heparin; peripheral vascular

Journal Title: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.