Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of drug‐coated balloon (DCB) treatment of femoropopliteal (FP) disease compared to balloon angioplasty (PTA) have demonstrated superior outcomes. A meta‐ analysis of 13 RCTs and 9… Click to show full abstract
Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of drug‐coated balloon (DCB) treatment of femoropopliteal (FP) disease compared to balloon angioplasty (PTA) have demonstrated superior outcomes. A meta‐ analysis of 13 RCTs and 9 registries demonstrated odds ratio of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD‐TLR) of 0.29 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.20–0.40] at 2 years. CD‐TLR and restenosis were also significantly less frequent with paclitaxel DCBs employing urea as the excipient such as the IN.PACT Admiral DCB. Similarly, a meta‐analysis of six trials with 541 patients with FP in‐stent restenosis demonstrated a relative risk of CD‐TLR of 0.38 [95% CI: 0.27–0.54] at 1 year. The DCB groups had greater symptomatic improvement than PTA as well.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.