Noninvasive methods of estimating invasively measured fractional flow reserve (FFRinvasive) are actively being explored, aiming to avoid the use of an invasive pressure wire and the administration of hyperemia‐inducing drugs.… Click to show full abstract
Noninvasive methods of estimating invasively measured fractional flow reserve (FFRinvasive) are actively being explored, aiming to avoid the use of an invasive pressure wire and the administration of hyperemia‐inducing drugs. Coronary angiography‐derived FFR (FFRangio) has already demonstrated its diagnostic performance in the context of stable coronary artery disease. However, its applicability in the context of non‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) has yet to be established. We sought to determine the diagnostic performance of FFRangio exclusively in patients presenting with NSTEMI. We performed a prospective, single‐center, single‐arm, double‐blinded study comparing FFR calculated by FFRangio to FFRinvasive in NSTEMI patients. FFRinvasive was measured in all angiographically intermediate lesions (30%–70% stenosis) and was then compared to FFRangio which was calculated at the same position, by a blinded operator. The primary endpoints were the sensitivity and specificity of FFRangio for predicting FFRinvasive using a cut‐off value of ≤0.80. Among 100 NSTEMI patients who were screened, 46 patients with 60 vessels in total underwent FFRinvasive and were included in the study. The mean value of FFRinvasive was 0.83 ± 0.3 with 22 (36%) being ≤0.80 while the mean FFRangio was 0.82 ± 0.1 with 22 (36%) being ≤0.80. FFRangio exhibited a sensitivity of 95.5%, a specificity of 97.4%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 96.7%. FFRangio can precisely and noninvasively estimate FFRinvasive in acute coronary syndromes and may have a role in guiding treatment decisions related to angiographically intermediate coronary lesions in this context.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.