BACKGROUND Pleomorphic liposarcoma (PLPS) is the least common but most aggressive of all forms of liposarcoma (LPS). Its diagnosis relies on the recognition of pleomorphic lipoblasts (PLBs), whose numbers vary… Click to show full abstract
BACKGROUND Pleomorphic liposarcoma (PLPS) is the least common but most aggressive of all forms of liposarcoma (LPS). Its diagnosis relies on the recognition of pleomorphic lipoblasts (PLBs), whose numbers vary considerably. Because few large fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy studies exist, the authors review their experience with PLPS. METHODS The authors' cytopathology files were searched for PLPS with histopathologic verification. FNA biopsy smears were performed via standard techniques. RESULTS Twenty cases from 20 patients (male/female ratio, 2.3/1; age range, 22-77 years; mean age, 58 years) met the inclusion criteria. All had tissue confirmation. Biopsy sites included the following: thigh (11 [55%]), upper extremity (4 [20%]), axilla (2 [10%]), neck (1 [5%]), chest wall (1 [5%]), and mediastinum (1 [5%]). Aspirates were from primary (17 [85%]), locally recurrent (2 [10%]), and metastatic neoplasms (1 [5%]). The FNA diagnoses were PLPS (10 [50%]), myxofibrosarcoma (4 [20%]), LPS (2 [10%]), sarcoma (2 [10%]), and high-grade malignant neoplasm (2 [10%]). Smears showed thick cell clusters and dissociated single forms. Pleomorphic, epithelioid, and bizarre cell/nuclear shapes were common. PLBs were absent, rare, or unnoticed in 45%. In 25%, smears dominated by myxoid stroma were diagnosed as high-grade myxofibrosarcoma or myxoid LPS. Ancillary testing performed in 5 cases had limited diagnostic efficacy. CONCLUSIONS FNA biopsy of PLPS, although able to successfully recognize malignancy, suffers from a sampling bias due to an inability to capture or recognize PLBs in a significant proportion of cases secondary to the heterogeneous composition of this neoplasm.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.