LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Variation of cytopathologists' use of the indeterminate diagnostic categories “atypical” and “suspicious for malignancy” in the cytologic diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions on endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspirates

Photo from wikipedia

Indeterminate cytologic diagnoses in endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (EUS‐FNA) of solid pancreatic lesions include the diagnostic categories “atypical” (ATY) and “suspicious for malignancy” (SUSP), which are used… Click to show full abstract

Indeterminate cytologic diagnoses in endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (EUS‐FNA) of solid pancreatic lesions include the diagnostic categories “atypical” (ATY) and “suspicious for malignancy” (SUSP), which are used at variable rates and are associated with variable underlying risk of malignancy. The aim of this study was to determine individual cytopathologists' rates of indeterminate diagnoses in EUS‐FNA of solid pancreatic lesions and their relationship to cytopathologists' experience and volume of pancreatic EUS‐FNA examined, as well as the potential impact of departmental consensus review on indeterminate diagnoses.

Keywords: guided fine; solid pancreatic; ultrasound guided; endoscopic ultrasound; malignancy; pancreatic lesions

Journal Title: Diagnostic Cytopathology
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.