LAUSR

OBJECTIVE To quantify the economic burden of binge-eating disorder (BED) in terms of work productivity loss, healthcare resource utilization, and healthcare costs. METHODS Respondents of the US National Health and Wellness Survey 2013 were invited to participate in a follow-up internet survey to identify adults with BED using DSM-5 criteria. Work productivity loss, healthcare resource utilization, and direct and indirect costs were assessed for BED respondents and matched non-BED respondents using generalized linear models or two-part models as appropriate. RESULTS A total of 1,720 people were included in our analysis (N = 344 with BED; N= 1,376 without BED). BED respondents had higher levels of activity impairment than non-BED respondents (41.29% vs. 23.18%, p < .001). Employed BED respondents (N = 178) had a greater level of work impairment than employed non-BED respondents (N = 686) (36.83% vs. 14.41%, p = .009). Higher healthcare resource utilization in the past 6 months among BED respondents was reported than matched non-BED respondents: numbers of surgeries (0.23 vs. 0.13, p = .021), ER visits (0.26 vs. 0.15, p = .016), and physician visits (6.09 vs. 4.56, p = .002). BED respondents reported higher total direct costs than matched non-BED respondents ($20,194 vs. $14,465, p = .005). The indirect costs among employed BED respondents were also higher than those without BED ($19,327 vs. $9,032, p < .001). DISCUSSION Individuals with BED reported significantly greater economic burden with respect to work productivity loss, level of healthcare resource utilization, and costs compared to non-BED respondents. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.(Int J Eat Disord 2017; 50:523-532).