Biomonitoring methylmercury (MeHg) exposure is problematic in resource-limited settings and with difficult-to-access populations where traditional biomarker approaches present logistical, economic, and ethical issues. The present study aimed to validate the… Click to show full abstract
Biomonitoring methylmercury (MeHg) exposure is problematic in resource-limited settings and with difficult-to-access populations where traditional biomarker approaches present logistical, economic, and ethical issues. The present study aimed to validate the use of dried blood spots (DBS) to assess MeHg exposure in a real-world contaminated field setting. DBS and whole blood samples were collected from electronic waste (e-waste) workers (n=20) from Agbogbloshie (Ghana) in 2017, and DBS were also artificially created in the laboratory using the field-collected blood. Whole blood MeHg concentrations averaged 0.84µg/L, which was not different from levels measured in the corresponding DBS samples (field-collected or artificial-created). Whole blood MeHg comprised 61% of the blood total mercury concentrations. Linear regression analysis revealed no differences in MeHg concentrations between whole blood samples and field-collected DBS (slope 0.89, R2 =0.94), and between field- and laboratory-DBS (slope 0.89, R2 =0.96). MeHg content in DBS punch blanks averaged 0.86 pg, and thus not of concern. These findings indicate that DBS are a suitable tool for assessing MeHg exposure in real-world environmental settings that may be heavily contaminated. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.