LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Relative impact of indels versus SNPs on complex disease

Photo from academic.microsoft.com

It is unclear whether insertions and deletions (indels) are more likely to influence complex traits than abundant single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). We sought to understand which category of variation is more… Click to show full abstract

It is unclear whether insertions and deletions (indels) are more likely to influence complex traits than abundant single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). We sought to understand which category of variation is more likely to impact health. Using the SardiNIA study as an exemplar, we characterized 478,876 common indels and 8,246,244 common SNPs in up to 5,949 well‐phenotyped individuals from an isolated valley in Sardinia. We assessed association between 120 traits, resulting in 89 nonoverlapping‐associated loci.We evaluated whether indels were enriched among credible sets of potential causal variants. These credible sets included 1,319 SNPs and 88 indels. We did not find indels to be significantly enriched. Indels were the most likely causal variant in seven loci, including one locus associated with monocyte count where an indel with causality and mechanism previously demonstrated (rs200748895:TGCTG/T) had a 0.999 posterior probability. Overall, our results show a very modest and nonsignificant enrichment for common indels in associated loci.

Keywords: snps; relative impact; versus snps; impact; impact indels; indels versus

Journal Title: Genetic Epidemiology
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.