LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

On the differences between mega‐ and meta‐imputation and analysis exemplified on the genetics of age‐related macular degeneration

Photo from wikipedia

While current genome‐wide association analyses often rely on meta‐analysis of study‐specific summary statistics, individual participant data (IPD) from multiple studies increase options for modeling. When multistudy IPD is available, however,… Click to show full abstract

While current genome‐wide association analyses often rely on meta‐analysis of study‐specific summary statistics, individual participant data (IPD) from multiple studies increase options for modeling. When multistudy IPD is available, however, it is unclear whether this data is to be imputed and modeled across all participants (mega‐imputation and mega‐analysis) or study‐specifically (meta‐imputation and meta‐analysis). Here, we investigated different approaches toward imputation and analysis using 52,189 subjects from 25 studies of the International Age‐related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Genomics Consortium including, 16,144 AMD cases and 17,832 controls for association analysis.

Keywords: imputation; age related; analysis; genetics; meta imputation; imputation analysis

Journal Title: Genetic Epidemiology
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.