LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY SYSTEMIC ANAPLASTIC LARGE T‐CELL LYMPHOMA (ALCL) RECEIVING BRENTUXIMAB VEDOTIN AND OUTCOME AFTER TREATMENT FAILURE.

Photo by schluditsch from unsplash

Introduction: Despite high overall 5‐year survival rates for childhood HL and sALCL, improved options are needed for patients (pts) who do not respond to, or relapse following, initial therapy. This… Click to show full abstract

Introduction: Despite high overall 5‐year survival rates for childhood HL and sALCL, improved options are needed for patients (pts) who do not respond to, or relapse following, initial therapy. This phase 1/ 2 open‐label, dose‐escalation trial (NCT01492088) evaluated the safety, PK, and antitumor activity of the antibody‐drug conjugate, brentuximab vedotin (BV), in pediatric pts with R/R HL or sALCL for whom treatment alternatives do not exist. Methods: BV was administered by intravenous infusion once every 21 days for up to 16 cycles, starting at 1.4 mg/kg up to 1.8 mg/kg to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). BV treatment beyond 16 cycles was permitted for pts with continued benefit. Overall response rate (ORR) was evaluated after 2 cycles and overall survival (OS) was assessed up to 2 years after last pt enrolment. Other secondary endpoints included time to progression/response (TTP/TTR), event/progression‐free survival (EFS/PFS), safety, and PK parameters. Results: Thirty‐six pts age range 7 to <18 years were enrolled and received BV. MTD was not reached. RP2D was determined to be 1.8 mg/kg. Sixteen R/R HL and 17 R/R sALCL pts were treated at the RP2D; 3 R/R HL pts were treated at 1.4 mg/kg. Pts received a median 7 (range 1–20) cycles of BV. Median follow‐up at data‐cut was 19.7 months. ORR (CR + PR) per IRF was 46% with an overall median TTR of 2.7 months. Overall (per IRF) median TTP was 4.8 months; EFS and PFS were 3.0 and 4.8 months, respectively. Median OS was not reached. In pts treated at the RP2D, greater clinical activity was seen in sALCL vs HL: ORR 53 vs 47%, median TTR 1.5 vs 2.7 months, TTP 6.2 vs 4.8 months, PFS 6.2 vs 3.8 months, and EFS 4.8 vs 2.1 months. After BV, 17 pts (47%) proceeded to transplant (including 9 sALCL pts, 6 of whom were first relapse pts). The highest ORR of 60% was seen in first relapse sALCL pts treated at the RP2D. Common treatment‐related adverse events (AEs) included pyrexia (44%), nausea (36%), and paresthesia (19%). The most common grade ≥ 3 AEs (16/36 pts) were neutropenia (11%), increased GGT (6%), and pyrexia (6%). Twelve pts (33%) experienced peripheral neuropathy (PN) of grade 1/2/3 (25%/6%/3%), with 83% resolving/improving by end of treatment; no pt discontinued due to PN. There were 4 treatment‐related serious AEs in 3 pts (all grade 3: hepatotoxicity, febrile neutropenia, pneumonia, and anaphylaxis). One on‐study death was reported but was considered unrelated to study drug per investigator. Conclusions: Response rates were clinically meaningful in this R/R HL and sALCL population with 47% of pts proceeding to transplant. This study shows BV is a feasible treatment option in pediatric HL and sALCL that can facilitate relapsed pts proceeding to transplant. A future study is ongoing to address the efficacy/safety of BV with chemotherapy in pediatric pts with newly diagnosed HL.

Keywords: salcl pts; pts treated; treatment; brentuximab vedotin; treated rp2d

Journal Title: Hematological Oncology
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.