LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

The role of Vertebral Augmentation Procedures in the management of vertebral compression fractures secondary to multiple myeloma.

Photo by homajob from unsplash

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Multiple myeloma (MM) is a systemic disorder characterised by proliferation of B-lymphocytes and plasma cells in the bone marrow. The primary aims of the management of spinal lesions… Click to show full abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Multiple myeloma (MM) is a systemic disorder characterised by proliferation of B-lymphocytes and plasma cells in the bone marrow. The primary aims of the management of spinal lesions in MM are pain control and fracture stabilisation. PURPOSE/METHODS Vertebral augmentation procedures (VAP) can be subdivided into percutaneous vertebroplasty (VP) and balloon kyphoplasty (BKP). BKP involves the placement of orthopaedic balloons into the fractured vertebral body, creating a void into which polymethylmethacrylate bone cement is injected.This review outlines the management of spinal lesions in patients with MM, with a focus on the comparative risks and efficacy of vertebroplasty (VP) and balloon kyphoplasty (BKP). RESULTS Soft tissue masses in MM are highly radiosensitive. Bisphosphonates and newer oncological therapies have decreased the indications for palliative radiotherapy, while spinal bracing can be utilised in selected cases to provide stability.BKP and VP provide equivalent long term pain control after MM vertebral compression fractures (VCF). BKP is superior to non-operative management and VP for restoration of vertebral body height and prevention of segmental kyphosis. Current evidence suggests a greater degree of correction of kyphotic deformity and restoration of mid vertebral height (MVH) with BKP when compared with VP.The literature supports the use of BKP even in the presence of posterior vertebral body wall (PVBW) fractures, a group previously considered a contraindication to VAP. Superior functional outcomes have been reported in patients undergoing early vs delayed BKP (<6-8 weeks). Current evidence supports a lower risk of cement extrusion with BKP than with VP, but serious complications following VAP are rare. CONCLUSIONS MM spinal pathology should be managed in a multidisciplinary setting. Surgical decompression and instrumentation are rarely indicated, due to the radio-sensitivity of soft tissue lesions in MM. BKP is a safe and effective procedure for VCF secondary to MM. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Keywords: bkp; management; augmentation procedures; multiple myeloma; vertebral compression; vertebral augmentation

Journal Title: Hematological oncology
Year Published: 2022

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.