LAUSR

OBJECTIVE The objective was to directly compare the effects and acceptability of telephone-based (TEL-CBT) with face-to-face cognitive-behavioral therapy (F2F-CBT) for family caregivers of people with dementia (PwD). METHOD Caregivers for whom F2F participation was possible were allocated to F2F-CBT (n = 49). The other participants were randomized to TEL-CBT (n = 139) or CG (n = 134). CBT consisted of 12 sessions over 6 months. RESULTS TEL-CBT yielded significantly better physical health (d = 0.27) and coping with daily hassles (d = 0.38) at posttest compared to F2F-CBT. Therapist competence, acceptability, and outcomes at follow-up did not differ between TEL-CBT and F2F-CBT. CONCLUSIONS TEL-CBT is a valuable alternative to F2F-CBT for family caregivers of PwD as TEL-CBT has the advantage of higher accessibility while it does not significantly differ from F2F-CBT in effectiveness and caregivers' evaluation of the setting, their experience with the therapist, and their satisfaction.