In New Zealand, nitrous oxide emissions from grazed hill pastures are estimated using different emission factors for urine and dung deposited on different slope classes. Allocation of urine and dung… Click to show full abstract
In New Zealand, nitrous oxide emissions from grazed hill pastures are estimated using different emission factors for urine and dung deposited on different slope classes. Allocation of urine and dung to each slope class needs to consider the distribution of slope classes within a landscape and animal behaviour. A Nutrient Transfer (NT) model has recently been incorporated into the New Zealand Agricultural GHG Inventory Model (AIM) to account for the allocation of excretal nitrogen (N) to each slope class. In this study, the predictive ability of the transfer function within the NT model was explored using urine deposition datasets collected with urine sensor and GPS tracker technology. Data were collected from three paddocks that had areas in low (LS; < 12ᴏ ), medium (MS; 12-24ᴏ ) and high slopes (HS; > 24ᴏ ). The NT model showed a good overall predictive ability for two of the three datasets. However, if the urine emission factors (EF3 ; % of urine N emitted as N2 O-N) were to be further disaggregated to assess emissions from all three slope classes or slope gradients, more precise data would be required to accurately represent the range of landscapes found on farms. We have identified the need for more geospatial data on urine deposition and animal location for farms that are topographically out of the range used to develop the model. These new datasets would provide livestock urine deposition on a more continuous basis across slopes (as opposed to broad ranges), a unique opportunity to improve the performance of the Nutrient Transfer model. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.