LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Comparative evaluation of two immunoassays for serological diagnosis of hepatitis E

Photo from wikipedia

Serological testing for immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies to Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is useful for diagnosing acute hepatitis E. Our aim was to evaluate the performance of chemiluminescence immunoassay (HEV… Click to show full abstract

Serological testing for immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies to Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is useful for diagnosing acute hepatitis E. Our aim was to evaluate the performance of chemiluminescence immunoassay (HEV IgM; Vircell, Granada, Spain) in comparison with a manual enzyme immunoassay (Anti‐HEV virus; Wantai, Beijing, China) for anti‐HEV IgM detection. Seventeen HEV‐RNA positive and 69 HEV‐RNA negative sera were tested by both assays. Virclia sensitivity was 94.1%, whereas that of the enzyme immunosorbent assay (EIA) was 76.5%; specificity was 98.5% and 97.1% for Virclia and EIA, respectively. Differences between both assays were not statistically significant. Virclia HEV IgM showed excellent performance and can be a good alternative to conventional enzyme immunoassays for the detection of IgM against HEV.

Keywords: evaluation two; hepatitis; hev igm; hev; comparative evaluation; two immunoassays

Journal Title: Journal of Medical Virology
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.