LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

No Difference Between Mechanical Perturbation Training with Compliant Surface and Manual Perturbation Training on Knee Functional Performance After ACL Rupture

Photo by victorfreitas from unsplash

Manual perturbation training improves dynamic knee stability and functional performance after anterior cruciate ligament rupture (ACL-rupture). However, it is limited to static standing position and does not allow time-specific perturbations… Click to show full abstract

Manual perturbation training improves dynamic knee stability and functional performance after anterior cruciate ligament rupture (ACL-rupture). However, it is limited to static standing position and does not allow time-specific perturbations at different phase of functional activities. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether administering mechanical perturbation training including compliant surface provides effects similar to manual perturbation training on knee functional measures after an acute ACL-rupture. Sixteen level I/II athletes with ACL-ruptures participated in this preliminary study. Eight patients received mechanical (Mechanical) and 8 subjects received manual perturbation training (Manual). All patients completed a functional testing (isometric quadriceps strength, single-legged hop tests) and patient-reported measures (Knee Outcome Survey- Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS), Global Rating Score (GRS), International Knee Documentation Committee 2000 (IKDC 2000) at pre- and post-training. 2X2 ANOVA was used for data analysis. No significant group-by-time interactions were found for all measures (p>0.18). Main effects of time were found for single hop (Pre-testing: 85.14%+21.07; Post-testing: 92.49%+17.55), triple hop (Pre-testing: 84.64%+14.17; Post-testing: 96.64%+11.14), KOS-ADLS (Pre-testing: 81.13%+11.12; Post-testing: 88.63%+12.63), GRS (Pre-testing: 68.63%+15.73; Post-testing: 78.81%+13.85), and IKDC 2000 (Pre-testing: 66.66%+9.85; Post-testing: 76.05%+14.62) (p<0.032). Administering mechanical perturbation training using compliant surfaces induce effects similar to manual perturbation training on knee functional performance after acute ACL-rupture. The clinical significance is both modes of training improve patients' functional-performance and limb-to-limb movement symmetry, and enhancing the patients' self-reported of knee functional measures after ACL rupture. Mechanical perturbation that provides a compliant surface might be utilized as part of the ACL rehabilitation training. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Keywords: manual perturbation; perturbation training; acl rupture; perturbation

Journal Title: Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.