LAUSR

BACKGROUND Periodontal disease has been proposed as a putative etiological factor for dementia. The aim of this investigation was to compare the incidence of dementia in individuals with or without deep probing pocket depths (DPPD), serving as a proxy for periodontitis. METHODS In this cohort study, conducted in Sweden, we identified 7992 individuals with DPPD and 29,182 matched individuals without DPPD (non-DPPD), using the Swedish Quality Registry for Caries and Periodontal Diseases (SKaPa). The two groups were followed for incident dementia (mean follow-up time was 7.6 years) based on data from the Swedish Dementia Registry (SveDem). The exposure-outcome relationship was explored by applying the Royston-Parmar (RP) flexible parametric survival model. RESULTS The incidence of dementia in the two groups was similar. In the DPPD group 137 (1.7%) developed dementia and 470 (1.6%) in the non-DPPD group. The incidence rate of dementia was estimated to be 2.3 per 1000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9 to 2.7) in the DPPD group and 2.1 per 1000 person-years (95% CI 1.9 to 2.3) in the non-DPPD group. The RP model disclosed no association between DPPD and dementia incidence after controlling for potential confounders (the exponentiated coefficient was estimated to 1.13 [95% CI = 0.39 to 3.24]). CONCLUSION In this sample, no association was revealed between deep probing pocket depths and the incidence of dementia.