LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Effect of locally applied simvastatin on clinical attachment level and alveolar bone in periodontal maintenance patients: A randomized clinical trial

Photo by nappystudio from unsplash

Abstract Background The purpose of this double‐masked, randomized, controlled trial was to determine if the local application of simvastatin (SIM), combined with minimally invasive papilla reflection and root planing (PR/RP),… Click to show full abstract

Abstract Background The purpose of this double‐masked, randomized, controlled trial was to determine if the local application of simvastatin (SIM), combined with minimally invasive papilla reflection and root planing (PR/RP), is effective in improving clinical attachment level (CAL), probing depth (PD) reduction, and increasing interproximal bone height (IBH) in persistent 6–9 mm periodontal pockets in patients receiving periodontal maintenance therapy (PMT). Methods Fifty patients with Stage III, Grade B periodontitis presenting with a 6–9 mm interproximal PD with a history of bleeding on probing (BOP) were included in the study. Experimental [PR/RP+SIM/methylcellulose (MCL); n = 27] and control (PR/RP+MCL; n = 23) therapies were randomly assigned. Root surfaces were accessed via reflection of interproximal papillae, followed by RP assisted with endoscope evaluation, acid etching, and SIM/MCL or MCL application. CAL, PD, BOP, plaque presence, and IBH (using standardized vertical bitewing radiographs) were evaluated at baseline and 12 months. Measurements were compared by group and time using Chi‐square, Wilcoxon rank‐sum, and t‐tests. Results Both PR/RP+SIM/MCL and PR/RP+MCL, respectively, resulted in improvements in clinical outcomes (CAL: ‐1.9 ± 0.3 mm, p < 0.0001; ‐1.0 ± 0.3 mm, p < 0.003; PD: ‐2.3 mm ± 0.3, p < 0.0001; ‐1.3 mm ± 0.3, p < 0.0001; BOP: ‐58.7%; ‐41.7%, p < 0.05) and stable IBH (‐0.2 ± 0.12, ‐0.4 ± 0.2, p = 0.22) from baseline to 12 months post‐therapy. PR/RP+SIM/MCL had more improvement in CAL (p = 0.03), PD (p = 0.007), and BOP (p = 0.047). Conclusions The addition of SIM/MCL to PR/RP improved CAL, PD, and BOP compared with PR/RP alone in periodontal maintenance patients.

Keywords: bop; clinical attachment; attachment level; periodontal maintenance; mcl

Journal Title: Journal of Periodontology
Year Published: 2022

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.