LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Is Pathology Always the Diagnostic Gold Standard in Neurodegeneration?

Photo by teveir from unsplash

I read with interest Galit Kleiner and colleagues ’ report of a 79-year-old man suffering from progressive hemichorea, spasticity, and a frontal behavioral syndrome, with thrombocytopenia and positive antiphospholipid antibodies.… Click to show full abstract

I read with interest Galit Kleiner and colleagues ’ report of a 79-year-old man suffering from progressive hemichorea, spasticity, and a frontal behavioral syndrome, with thrombocytopenia and positive antiphospholipid antibodies. 1 Rationally, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (aPS) was the antemortem diagnosis. However, brain autopsy revealed a pattern of tau aggregation diagnostic of the pallidonigroluysian atrophy (PNLA) variant of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). The authors concluded that aPS must have been a red herring. Is neuropathology always the fi nal diagnosis? If so, was chorea also a red herring? Will any entity ever cease to expand if held to a pathology gold standard? Will the differential between hyper-and hypokinetic movement disorders remain negotiable pending a pathology report?

Keywords: always diagnostic; diagnostic gold; pathology; pathology always; gold standard

Journal Title: Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
Year Published: 2022

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.