LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Reliability of tumor segmentation in glioblastoma: impact on the robustness of MRI-radiomic features.

Photo by mojaghrout from unsplash

PURPOSE The use of radiomic features as biomarkers of treatment response and outcome or as correlates to genomic variations requires that the computed features are robust and reproducible. Segmentation, a… Click to show full abstract

PURPOSE The use of radiomic features as biomarkers of treatment response and outcome or as correlates to genomic variations requires that the computed features are robust and reproducible. Segmentation, a crucial step in radiomic analysis, is a major source of variability in the computed radiomic features. Therefore, we studied the impact of tumor segmentation variability on the robustness of MRI radiomic features. METHOD Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1WICE ) MRI of 90 patients diagnosed with glioblastoma were segmented using a semi-automatic algorithm and an interactive segmentation with two different raters. We analyzed the robustness of 108 radiomic features from 5 categories (intensity histogram, gray-level co-occurrence matrix, gray-level size-zone matrix (GLSZM), edge maps and shape) using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland and Altman analysis. RESULTS Our results show that both segmentation methods are reliable with ICC ≥ 0.96 and standard deviation (SD) of mean differences between the two raters (SDdiffs ) ≤ 30%. Features computed from the histogram and co-occurrence matrices were found to be the most robust (ICC ≥ 0.8 and SDdiffs ≤ 30% for most features in these groups). Features from GLSZM were shown to have mixed robustness. Edge, shape and GLSZM features were the most impacted by the choice of segmentation method with the interactive method resulting in more robust features than the semi-automatic method. Finally, features computed from T1WICE and FLAIR images were found to have similar robustness when computed with the interactive segmentation method. CONCLUSION Semi-automatic and interactive segmentation methods using two raters are both reliable. The interactive method produced more robust features than the semi-automatic method. We also found that the robustness of radiomic features varied by categories. Therefore, this study could help motivate segmentation methods and feature selection in MRI radiomic studies. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Keywords: radiomic features; mri radiomic; segmentation; method; robustness

Journal Title: Medical physics
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.