LAUSR

PURPOSE Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging has been implemented on the Leksell Gamma Knife® Icon TM for assessing patient positioning in mask-based Gamma Knife radiosurgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the CBCT-based patient positioning system as a tool for frameless Gamma Knife radiosurgery. METHODS Daily quality assurance (QA) CBCT precision test results from a 12-month period were analyzed for the geometric accuracy and the stability of the imager. The performance of the image acquisition module and the image registration algorithm was evaluated using an anthropomorphic head phantom (CIRS Inc., Norfolk, VA) and a XYZR axis manual positioning stage (TOAUTO Inc., Guangdong, China). The head phantom was fixed on a mask adaptor and manually translated in the X, Y, Z directions or rotated around the X, Y, Z axes in the range of ±10 mm or ±10º. A CBCT scan was performed after each manual position setup followed by an image registration to the reference scan. To assess the overall setup uncertainties in fractionated treatment, two cylindrical Presage phantoms (Heuris Inc., Skillman, NJ) of 15 cm diameter and 10 cm height were irradiated with identical prescription dose and shot placement following standard mask-based treatment workflow according to two different fraction schedules: a single fraction treatment of 7.5 Gy and a 5-fraction treatment with 1.5 Gy per fraction. RESULTS The averaged vector deviations of the 4 marks from their preset values are 0.087 mm, 0.085 mm, 0.095 mm, and 0.079 mm from the 212 daily QA tests. The averaged displacements in the X, Y, Z coordinates and the pitch, yaw, roll angles from the image registration tests are 0.23 mm, 0.27 mm, 0.14 mm, 0.32º, 0.19º, 0.31º from the manual setup. The corresponding maximum differences are 0.41 mm, 0.33 mm, 0.29 mm, 0.45º, 0.31º, and 0.43º respectively. Compared to the treatment plan using the 2% & 1 mm criteria, the averaged 2D Gamma passing rate is 98.25% for the measured dose distribution from the Presage phantom with 1-fraction irradiation and 95.12% for the 5-fraction irradiation. The averaged Gamma passing rates are 99.53% and 98.16% for the 1 fraction and 5-fraction irradiations using the 2% & 2 mm criteria. CONCLUSION The CBCT imager and the image registration algorithm can reproduce phantom position with less than 0.5mm/0.5º uncertainty. A systematic contribution from the inter-fraction phantom repositioning procedure was observed in the Gamma analysis over the irradiated volumes of two end-to-end test phantoms.