LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

OPEN SURGERY FOR IN UTERO REPAIR OF SPINA BIFIDA: MICRONEUROSURGERY VS STANDARD TECHNIQUE. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.

Photo from wikipedia

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Prenatal myelomeningocele (MMC) repair has been shown to improve neurological outcomes. It has been suggested that decreases in the hysterotomy diameter during surgery can improve perinatal outcomes without altering… Click to show full abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Prenatal myelomeningocele (MMC) repair has been shown to improve neurological outcomes. It has been suggested that decreases in the hysterotomy diameter during surgery can improve perinatal outcomes without altering neurologic outcomes. The objective of this study is to describe and compare the main maternal and fetal outcomes of fetuses undergoing open surgery for MMC repair, through the different modifications (standard-classical, mini-hysterotomy, and Microneurosurgery). DATA SOURCE MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid, SciELO, LILACS, PROSPERO. RESULTS From a total of 112 studies, 7 case series were selected including 399 fetuses with open fetal surgery, 5 studies using the classical technique (n = 181), one with mini-hysterotomy (n = 176), and one with the microneurosurgery technique (n = 42). The mini-hysterotomy and microneurosurgery techniques presented a lower risk of preterm delivery (21.4% and 30%, respectively) compared to the classic technique (47.3%), premature rupture of membranes (78%, 62%, and 72.5 %, respectively), oligohydramnios (0% and 72.5%, respectively), dehiscence of hysterotomy, maintaining the same frequency of Chiari reversion (78%, 62%, and 72.5%, respectively), postnatal correction requirement (0%, 4.8%, and 5.8%, respectively), and lower frequency of requirement for a ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement (13.0%, 7.5%, and 29.1%, respectively). CONCLUSION The least invasive techniques (minihysterotomy-Microneurosurgery) are possible and reproduceable, as they are associated with better maternal and perinatal outcomes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. WHAT'S ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS TOPIC?; WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD? WHAT'S ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS TOPIC?; WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD? (NOT APPLICABLE TO CORRESPON WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD?: Prenatal myelomeningocele repair reverses or corrects the rhombencephalon hernia and reduces the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement and improves the composite score for mental development and motor function at 30 months. This is the first systematic review that compares open techniques for the repair of prenatal myelomeningocele with its different modifications: standard-clasical (6-8 cm), minihysterotomy (3.5 cm) and microneurosurgery (1.5 cm). We describe the main maternal and fetal outcomes.

Keywords: technique; microneurosurgery; surgery; systematic review; open surgery; repair

Journal Title: Prenatal diagnosis
Year Published: 2021

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.