LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Validation to correct for outcome misclassification bias

Photo from wikipedia

Key Points 1. Outcome validation is often requested by regulators to address misclassification bias in database studies of drug safety and comparative effectiveness. 2. Validation studies commonly report only one… Click to show full abstract

Key Points 1. Outcome validation is often requested by regulators to address misclassification bias in database studies of drug safety and comparative effectiveness. 2. Validation studies commonly report only one positive predictive value (PPV) estimate. 3. Since a high value of PPV does not imply misclassification bias is negligible, and a low value of PPV does not imply misclassification bias is important, this approach does not adequately address outcome misclassification bias. 4. Validation should be designed to inform quantitative bias analysis that corrects results for misclassification bias. 5. To correct for misclassification bias, quantitative bias analysis requires parameters for false positive errors and false negative errors in each comparison group.

Keywords: misclassification bias; misclassification; validation; outcome misclassification; value ppv

Journal Title: Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
Year Published: 2023

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.