LAUSR

Though many folded proteins assume one stable structure that performs one function, a small‐but‐increasing number remodel their secondary and tertiary structures and change their functions in response to cellular stimuli. These fold‐switching proteins regulate biological processes and are associated with autoimmune dysfunction, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus‐2 infection, and more. Despite their biological importance, it is difficult to computationally predict fold switching. With the aim of advancing computational prediction and experimental characterization of fold switchers, this review discusses several features that distinguish fold‐switching proteins from their single‐fold and intrinsically disordered counterparts. First, the isolated structures of fold switchers are less stable and more heterogeneous than single folders but more stable and less heterogeneous than intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). Second, the sequences of single fold, fold switching, and intrinsically disordered proteins can evolve at distinct rates. Third, proteins from these three classes are best predicted using different computational techniques. Finally, late‐breaking results suggest that single folders, fold switchers, and IDPs have distinct patterns of residue–residue coevolution. The review closes by discussing high‐throughput and medium‐throughput experimental approaches that might be used to identify new fold‐switching proteins.