LAUSR

Adjoints of numerical weather prediction models may be employed for forecast sensitivity to observations (FSO) in order to monitor the contribution of ingested observation data on short‐term forecast skill. However, the calculation of short‐term forecast error is difficult, due to the lack of a truly independent dataset for verification. In an Observing System Simulation Experiment (OSSE) framework, the Nature Run is able to provide a true and complete verification dataset and allows accurate evaluation of short‐term forecast errors. In this work, an OSSE developed at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Global Modeling and Assimilation Office is used to explore the impact of observational data on forecasts in the 6–48 hour range. An adjoint of the Global Earth Observing System model is employed to compare the observation impacts estimated using both self‐analysis verification and the true Nature Run verification. Self‐analysis verification is found to inflate the estimated forecast‐error growth during the early forecast period, resulting in overestimations of observation impacts, particularly in the 6–12 hour forecast range. By 48 hours, the self‐analysis verification estimates of forecast error and observation impacts match the true values more closely. The fraction of beneficial observations is also overinflated at short forecast times when self‐analysis verification is used. The progression of impacts of an individual observation or data type depends on the character of growth of the initial‐condition error that each observation affects.