LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Improving the efficiency of individually randomized clinical trials by staggering the introduction of the intervention.

Photo from wikipedia

In cluster randomized trials, the introduction of the intervention can be staggered in different clusters, leading to a stepped wedge design. This strategy can lead to gains in efficiency, which… Click to show full abstract

In cluster randomized trials, the introduction of the intervention can be staggered in different clusters, leading to a stepped wedge design. This strategy can lead to gains in efficiency, which might also translate to the context of individually randomized trials, though this has been relatively unexplored. Here, we present one illustrative example. We consider trials in which participants start in a control condition such as routine care and can cross over at any stage to the active intervention. We make the assumption that the effect of the intervention is the same however long the delay before a participant crosses over to the intervention condition. We consider designs for a trial with three repeated assessments, including a baseline, and show that a three-sequence design with staggered introduction of the intervention in two of the sequences estimates the treatment effect after one period more efficiently than a parallel groups design.

Keywords: intervention; improving efficiency; introduction intervention; individually randomized

Journal Title: Statistics in medicine
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.