LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Separating insider and informed behavior: Evidence from a natural setting

Previous literature has established the need to separate insider from expert trading in both financial and betting markets. This type of separation proves difficult to achieve because experts and insiders… Click to show full abstract

Previous literature has established the need to separate insider from expert trading in both financial and betting markets. This type of separation proves difficult to achieve because experts and insiders co‐exist in most market settings. Utilizing novel betting markets in which expert skill bettors are unable to use their expert knowledge, this study uncouples insider from expert betting, and allows more direct measurement of insider trading than in previous empirical tests. Evidence is presented in favor of some predictions from the highly cited Shin model of insider trading. Price setters charge an extra premium in markets with high proportions of insiders when compared to equivalent markets. The insiders accurately predict event outcomes, and their presence exacerbates a well known bias in betting market prices whereby returns on betting favorites is higher than for bets on longshots.

Keywords: evidence; insider informed; separating insider; insider; behavior evidence; informed behavior

Journal Title: Southern Economic Journal
Year Published: 2024

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.