LAUSR

The characteristics of different shapes of nonmetallic inclusions (NMIs) are determined using different methods. In this respect, various shapes of NMIs, including spherical, octahedral, elongated, bar‐like, plate‐like, polyhedral, and irregular inclusions, are observed in different steels and ferroalloys. The inclusions are investigated using three methods: 1) 2D investigations on a polished cross section (2D method); 2) 3D investigations on a film filter after electrolytic extraction and filtration (EE method); and 3) 3D investigations on a metal surface after electrolytic extraction (MS method). In addition, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with an energy‐dispersive spectrometer (EDS) is used for the determination of the chemical composition of inclusions. The advantages and limitations of different methods for investigations of different shaped inclusions are discussed. The results show that the 2D method is less precise to detect the morphology, size, and number of inclusions; however, the EE and MS methods are used to determine a more accurate morphology. Furthermore, the MS method is found to be more advantageous in detecting large‐sized inclusions. This study also shows that the results on both the film filter and metal surface should be grouped together to obtain more comprehensive information of the inclusion characteristics.