LAUSR

Our current knowledge on nanomaterials is mostly built on data from basic studies, and the application and developmental potentials of nanomaterials are emphasized. On the other hand, standard evaluation methods, models, exposure methods, standards, and guidelines for biological effect evaluation are inadequate. In response to the bottlenecks of supervision, scientific research institutes and regulatory organizations in China have cooperated closely to research and establish an evaluation system for nanomedical devices, and silver-containing nanomaterials have been adopted as an example. In such a context, reference materials, characterization strategies, in vitro and in vivo distribution and toxicity evaluation standards have been established. This article highlights research on the risk assessment of nanomedical device products (taking silver-containing nanomedical device products as an example) in China, including the characterization and release determination strategies, determination of nanosilver in tissues, applications of three-dimensional skin models and in vitro and toxicity evaluation standards have been established. This article highlights research on technical standards. As a consequence, the "Guidelines for the safety and effectiveness evaluation of nanomedical devices" were published in 2021, and a market entry framework for nanomedical devices has been preliminarily formed as a significant component in scientific supervision. This Guideline supervises the review and supervision of nanomedical devices and, therefore, provides a guarantee for the market access of nanomedical devices in China. This article is categorized under: Toxicology and Regulatory Issues in Nanomedicine > Toxicology of Nanomaterials Toxicology and Regulatory Issues in Nanomedicine > Regulatory and Policy Issues in Nanomedicine.