Using traditional capture methods, shrews typically have low capture and high trap‐mortality rates. To reduce effects from live‐trapping and attempt to increase detection success, we investigated 3 potential noninvasive survey… Click to show full abstract
Using traditional capture methods, shrews typically have low capture and high trap‐mortality rates. To reduce effects from live‐trapping and attempt to increase detection success, we investigated 3 potential noninvasive survey methods for shrews (Soricidae): track tubes, scat tubes, and camera traps. These 3 techniques were tested in areas of the San Joaquin Valley, California, USA, with high detection rates of shrews during previous live‐trapping surveys. We found that Reconyx camera traps specifically modified with a close focal distance resulted in the greatest number of positive detections and outperformed all other survey methods. Scat tubes also resulted in positive detections but were less reliable and required more expertise. Track tubes resulted in no positive detections. Use of camera traps is highly recommended for conducting presence–absence surveys for shrews. © 2020 The Wildlife Society.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.